Connect with us

Business

99% CKP Bank Depositors to Get Back Full Money: RBI Reports

Published

on

MUMBAI: The RBI has mentioned that of the 1.three lakh depositors of CKP Co-operative Bank, about 99.2% will get full cost of their deposits from the Deposit Insurance coverage and Credit score Assure Company. 
On Saturday, the RBI had introduced that it has cancelled the licence of CKP Co-op Bank with impact from April 30 and has requested the registrar of cooperative societies to provoke winding up proceedings and appoint a liquidator for the financial institution.


The 105-year outdated cooperative financial institution had eight branches unfold throughout Mumbai and Thane. Its identity is an abbreviation of Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu, the Maharashtrian group that began the financial institution.


The cooperative lender on its web site has mentioned that it 55 wilful defaulters owe greater than Rs 209 crore. It has named Vijay Vaidya of Nanai Dairy and Avishkar Builders, Dinesh Shah of Labdhi Company, Dyandev Salunkhe of Siddharth Dairy and Phulchand Jagtap of Siddharth Dairy as prime defaulters. “CKP Co-op financial institution has been below the all-inclusive path of the RBI since 2014. As there was no scope for the revival of the financial institution, its licence has been cancelled,” a financial institution spokesperson mentioned in an announcement on Twitter.

Advertisement

That is the primary time the central financial institution is triggering the upper deposit insurance coverage restrict, which got here into impact after the Union Price range in February 2021.


In accordance to the financial institution’s web site, its deposits stood at Rs 485 crore as on November 2019, whereas loans excellent have been Rs 161 crore. It had a destructive internet price of Rs 239 crore due to defaults.


“The monetary place of the financial institution is extremely antagonistic and unsustainable. There is no such thing as a concrete revival plan or proposal for a merger with one other financial institution. Credible dedication in the direction of revival from the administration is just not seen,” the RBI mentioned.

Advertisement


“The financial institution is just not ready to pay its current and future depositors, thereby not complying with the legislation,” the central financial institution mentioned. Central financial institution officers mentioned that the financial institution couldn’t be allowed to restart operations because it didn’t have the minimal required capital adequacy and reserves and there was no incomes potential.


In accordance to RBI spokesperson, the affairs of the financial institution have been and are being carried out in a way detrimental to the general public curiosity and curiosity of the depositors and that the overall character of the administration of the financial institution is prejudicial to the curiosity of depositors as additionally the general public curiosity.

Advertisement

Manvendra Chaudhary, with over 5 years of professional experience as CEO of Unique News and Megalent Marketing, shares insights on life, business, and health for your success.

1 Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

World

New Class-Action Lawsuit Accuses Rivian of Making Materially False and Misleading Statements

Published

on

New Class-Action Lawsuit Accuses Rivian of Making Materially False and Misleading Statements

Electric vehicle manufacturer Rivian has been slapped with a lawsuit which alleged that the company misled the investors with false claims regarding its business, operations and prospects.

The class-action lawsuit made a number of allegations which included overstating the demand of its Electric vehicles and also not making it clear how it will handle the negative and near-term macroeconomic impacts.

The lawsuit also revealed that Rivian’s business was experiencing reduced demands as well as increased customer cancellations precipitated by inter alia, high interest rates.

Advertisement

The orders had significantly reduced and this has significantly reduced the profits and the manufacturing of vehicles in 2024.

Rivian Faces New Class-Action Lawsuit Alleging Deceptive Statements

The lawsuit also alleged that the Company’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

Rivian’s stock, like all other EV startups, has been tanking and this has angered the investors who saw a major portion of their investments eroded and a number of law firms like Bernstein Liebhard LLP announced this week that it has filed a securities class action lawsuit on investors’ behalf.

Advertisement

The lawsuit stated that the EV manufacturer had violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and has asked investors who had bought shares of Rivian Automotive, Inc. between March 1, 2023, and February 21, 2024, to join its suit.

The company’s stocks have fallen and one of the primary reasons was the high interest rates. Rivian’s products are beyond the reach of an average income household.

Also Read: Prime Hydration Faces Lawsuits Claiming Its Sports Drink, Prime Energy, Contains PFAS and Excessive Caffeine

Advertisement

The Rivian’s Electric vehicles target customers were wealthier clients and the spurt in order cancellations means this class is walking away from Rivian’s product.

The stocks of the company were popular for the investors but the reduced demands caused by higher borrowing cost have hit its stock prices badly.

The price war has also affected the EV sector and the company also with its competitors like Tesla has been uniformly affected.

Advertisement

The EV sector marked value has tanked by more than 57% year-to-date.

The chance of a fall in interest rates is not expected since the Federal Reserve will not lower the benchmark interest rate since it could lead to a bout of hyperinflation.

Also another factor which will discourage the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates is the soaring energy prices caused by the war in Ukraine and the Middle East.

Advertisement

Also Read: Lawsuit Claims Kennywood Concealed Steel Curtain Closure to Boost Sales

Continue Reading

World

Lawsuit Claims Kennywood Concealed Steel Curtain Closure to Boost Sales

Published

on

Lawsuit Claims Kennywood Concealed Steel Curtain Closure to Boost Sales

Kennywood’s Steel Curtain roller coaster will not be available this 2024 season, and this has miffed a Kensington man to the extent that he has filed a lawsuit against Kennywood and its parent companies, alleging that the officials had known this fact long before but withheld it to boost season pass sales.

Lawsuit Against Kennywood

The lawsuit, filed in the Allegheny County Common Pleas Court by Joshua Miller and his attorney, John A. Biedrzycki III on Monday, alleges that it was a deliberate attempt to hide the fact to accrue financial benefits by boosting season pass sales.

The lawsuit alleges that Kennywood has created advertising campaigns targeting consumers like Mr. Miller and others to purchase the 2024 season pass under the belief that the benefits included myriad park attractions, including the Steel Curtain.

Advertisement

In the lawsuit, it was revealed that Mr. Miller bought his season pass under the assumption that all rides would be operational.

However, on April 17, three days before the park opened for the season, it was revealed that Steel Curtain would be closed for the season.

The announcement was made by Ricky Spicuzza, the park’s assistant general manager, and the reason for the closure was cited as the coaster undergoing an “extensive modification project.”

Advertisement

Ricky Spicuzza said,

“We understand the frustration many of you have felt not being able to experience the Steel Curtain. On behalf of our entire team, we absolutely share that frustration with you.”

However, the lawsuit contends that the fact was known long before last week that the 220-foot-tall coaster would be out of commission.

The lawsuit states,

Advertisement

“The company withheld this information from season pass purchasers so as not to lose season pass customers, or, alternatively, so as not to offer a discount on season passes due to the unavailability of the Steel Curtain.”

The lawsuit also details numerous violations of the state’s unfair trade practices and consumer protection law. This includes failure to disclose the Steel Curtain’s closure with the full knowledge that the consumer believed that it would be functional for the 2024 season.

The park offered varied passes, which ranged from season passes priced from $109.99 to $239.99.

The lowest endowed pass was the bronze pass, which provided unfettered admission except on certain blackout dates.

Advertisement

The premium range included the platinum pass, which offered year-round admission to Kennywood, Sandcastle, Idlewild, and Palace Entertainment’s Dutch Wonderland in Lancaster.

Additionally, it also offered free parking, discounts on food and retail, and three free guest tickets.

Also Read: Prime Hydration Faces Lawsuits Claiming Its Sports Drink, Prime Energy, Contains PFAS and Excessive Caffeine

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Prime Hydration Faces Lawsuits Claiming Its Sports Drink, Prime Energy, Contains PFAS and Excessive Caffeine

Published

on

Prime Hydration

Prime Energy, the sports drink from Prime Hydration, has been hit by a number of lawsuits for containing excessive amounts of caffeine and PFAS. Another lawsuit was filed on April 8 in the Southern District of New York, accusing Prime Hydration, the parent company which manufactures the sports drink, of engaging in misleading and deceptive practices.

Prime Hydration was founded by two Logan Paul and KSI in 2022, and the products became very popular thanks to the huge followings of the YouTubers. However, the company is now facing a slew of lawsuits over the ingredients in their energy and sports drinks.

New Lawsuit Against Prime Hydration

The latest lawsuit, filed on April 8, accuses the company’s 12-ounce energy drinks of containing 215-225 milligrams of caffeine, exceeding the permissible limit of 200 milligrams. The lawsuit was filed by Lara Vera, a resident of Poughkeepsie, New York.

Advertisement

The lawsuit details that the plaintiff had purchased Prime’s Blue Raspberry products on numerous occasions in August 2022 for about $3 to $4 each, unaware that the products contained caffeine beyond the permissible limits. The plaintiff is seeking damages of $5 million from the company. Lara Vera’s lawsuit alleges that Prime advertised 200 milligrams of caffeine, which is equal to six Coke cans or two 12-ounce Red Bulls. One Red Bull can could contain 114 milligrams of caffeine.

Also Read: Johnson Controls subsidiary Tyco Fire Products to pay $750 mn to settle ‘forever chemicals’ lawsuit

The suit also alleges that there are no safe limits of caffeine for children and that caffeine has been indicted for causing tachycardia, headaches, convulsions, tremors, upset digestion, and adversely affecting mental health.

Advertisement

Earlier, Senator Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., had asked the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to investigate Prime energy drinks in 2023 after reports that the products contained high levels of caffeine. The Senator also accused the company of using vague marketing tactics focused on young people, influencing parents to buy the caffeine-laced drinks for their kids. The lawsuit by Vera also quotes the Senator’s call to the FDA.

Prime is also facing another lawsuit filed on Aug. 2, 2023, in the Northern District of California by the Milberg law firm on behalf of Elizabeth Castillo and others. The lawsuit charges Prime’s products with using flavors containing PFAS, or “forever chemicals.” Forever chemicals are a class of chemicals that are not degraded in the human body or nature and have been indicted as a carcinogenic substance. Independent third-party testing has confirmed that Prime Hydration grape flavor contained PFAS.

Also Read: California mother files lawsuit against Tesla after her 2-year-old child starts Model X and runs over her

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

This will close in 5 seconds