Connect with us

Business

Are Innovative Finance ISAs worth it & How Risky Are They?

This is specifically true for Innovative Finance ISA (IFISA) investment, mainly because it offers high rewards.

Published

on

abundance bank banking banknotes

Investing your hard-earned money is not an easy decision. There are several questions that come to mind. There are many things involved that you must understand completely before you invest your money. One of the essential questions that you must know the answer to is how risky the investment is?

This is specifically true for Innovative Finance ISA (IFISA) investment, mainly because it offers high rewards. Most investors want to know the risk level of IFISA investments. Hence we have compiled this guide together to help you understand all the risks involved in Innovative Finance ISAs. This can give you a clear understanding you need for IFISA accounts.  

What is an Innovative Finance ISA?

 Innovative Finance ISAs allow you to use parts of or all of your annual individual savings accounts allowance to invest in loans through peer to peer lending market while earning tax-free interest and capital gains. 

Advertisement

Peer to peer lending offers higher return rates compared to other forms of ISAs because it eliminates the middleman that would be the bank. But, contrary to the other types of ISAs, the Innovative ISAs are not covered by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).this means that if the IFISA provider goes out of business, you may lose your money. 

Since the returns are higher, there are more risks that you need to take. However, what kinds of risks are there, and is it all worth it?

Innovative Finance ISAs- what risks can you expect?

The biggest risk that you must know about is of ‘default.’ Either a borrower may default on their loan or the peer to peer firm could go out of business. As mentioned above, there is no cover from the FSCS, so neither your returns nor your capital is guaranteed if either of these happen. 

Advertisement

But you don’t need to worry; there are some measures you can take to significantly reduce the risks. First, you can spread your funds over several loans and safeguard your funds. Second, you can also talk to an Innovative Finance ISA expert if you need to learn more about this type of investment. 

Is IFISA worth the risk?

To put it into context, the Innovative ISAs are considered a midpoint in terms of rewards and risks between cash ISA and stocks & share ISA. The IFISA was first introduced in 2016. Since then, investors have enjoyed steady interests from the IFISA till the present day. Combine this with the fact that the majority cash ISA pays interest rate below the inflation rate. The answer for most IFISA investors would be yes, IFISA are work the risk. However, it is always a good idea to invest wisely. To make sure that you understand everything clearly, you need to learn about all types of ISAs and investing options. 

To help you understand everything correctly, let’s go over some of the most frequently asked questions.

Advertisement

Innovative Finance ISA FAQ’s

Below are the most common questions that people often ask about IFISAs.

What are the limits of an IFISA?

Every adult in the UK can invest up to £20,000 in an Innovative Finance ISA per tax year. However, this ISA allowance will be shared among all your different ISAs. Hence, if you contribute to a cash or stocks & shares ISA as well, then you will have to share your current year’s ISA allowance limit. But, the total amount you will earn will be uncapped. 

Advertisement

How are IFISAs regulated?

Every peer to peer lending firm must have complete authorization from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in order to offer IFISAs to their customers. This is to make sure that there is protection in place for all customers, particularly for investors/ lenders, along with borrowers. The authorization from the FCA ensures that the peer to peer lending platform adheres to the common rules and regulations. And that they provide every product in a fair and clear way. Also, some regulations are in place for handling client’s funds and complaint procedures. 

Is it possible to transfer other types of ISAs into an Innovative Finance ISA?

Advertisement

Yes, it is possible. However, you have to ensure that you won’t get penalized for doing so by checking if there are any restrictions with your existing ISA provider

If you have savings set aside for a rainy day, then it is good to invest that money, especially if you don’t need the money immediately. If you are not afraid to take a little risk and tie your money for some time, then Innovative Finance ISA may be the right option for you. There are a lot of IFISA providers in the market. Just choose the one that offers services that match your financial goals. Don’t just let your money sit in one place. Use it to earn more!

Advertisement

World

New Class-Action Lawsuit Accuses Rivian of Making Materially False and Misleading Statements

Published

on

New Class-Action Lawsuit Accuses Rivian of Making Materially False and Misleading Statements

Electric vehicle manufacturer Rivian has been slapped with a lawsuit which alleged that the company misled the investors with false claims regarding its business, operations and prospects.

The class-action lawsuit made a number of allegations which included overstating the demand of its Electric vehicles and also not making it clear how it will handle the negative and near-term macroeconomic impacts.

The lawsuit also revealed that Rivian’s business was experiencing reduced demands as well as increased customer cancellations precipitated by inter alia, high interest rates.

Advertisement

The orders had significantly reduced and this has significantly reduced the profits and the manufacturing of vehicles in 2024.

Rivian Faces New Class-Action Lawsuit Alleging Deceptive Statements

The lawsuit also alleged that the Company’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

Rivian’s stock, like all other EV startups, has been tanking and this has angered the investors who saw a major portion of their investments eroded and a number of law firms like Bernstein Liebhard LLP announced this week that it has filed a securities class action lawsuit on investors’ behalf.

Advertisement

The lawsuit stated that the EV manufacturer had violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and has asked investors who had bought shares of Rivian Automotive, Inc. between March 1, 2023, and February 21, 2024, to join its suit.

The company’s stocks have fallen and one of the primary reasons was the high interest rates. Rivian’s products are beyond the reach of an average income household.

Also Read: Prime Hydration Faces Lawsuits Claiming Its Sports Drink, Prime Energy, Contains PFAS and Excessive Caffeine

Advertisement

The Rivian’s Electric vehicles target customers were wealthier clients and the spurt in order cancellations means this class is walking away from Rivian’s product.

The stocks of the company were popular for the investors but the reduced demands caused by higher borrowing cost have hit its stock prices badly.

The price war has also affected the EV sector and the company also with its competitors like Tesla has been uniformly affected.

Advertisement

The EV sector marked value has tanked by more than 57% year-to-date.

The chance of a fall in interest rates is not expected since the Federal Reserve will not lower the benchmark interest rate since it could lead to a bout of hyperinflation.

Also another factor which will discourage the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates is the soaring energy prices caused by the war in Ukraine and the Middle East.

Advertisement

Also Read: Lawsuit Claims Kennywood Concealed Steel Curtain Closure to Boost Sales

Continue Reading

World

Lawsuit Claims Kennywood Concealed Steel Curtain Closure to Boost Sales

Published

on

Lawsuit Claims Kennywood Concealed Steel Curtain Closure to Boost Sales

Kennywood’s Steel Curtain roller coaster will not be available this 2024 season, and this has miffed a Kensington man to the extent that he has filed a lawsuit against Kennywood and its parent companies, alleging that the officials had known this fact long before but withheld it to boost season pass sales.

Lawsuit Against Kennywood

The lawsuit, filed in the Allegheny County Common Pleas Court by Joshua Miller and his attorney, John A. Biedrzycki III on Monday, alleges that it was a deliberate attempt to hide the fact to accrue financial benefits by boosting season pass sales.

The lawsuit alleges that Kennywood has created advertising campaigns targeting consumers like Mr. Miller and others to purchase the 2024 season pass under the belief that the benefits included myriad park attractions, including the Steel Curtain.

Advertisement

In the lawsuit, it was revealed that Mr. Miller bought his season pass under the assumption that all rides would be operational.

However, on April 17, three days before the park opened for the season, it was revealed that Steel Curtain would be closed for the season.

The announcement was made by Ricky Spicuzza, the park’s assistant general manager, and the reason for the closure was cited as the coaster undergoing an “extensive modification project.”

Advertisement

Ricky Spicuzza said,

“We understand the frustration many of you have felt not being able to experience the Steel Curtain. On behalf of our entire team, we absolutely share that frustration with you.”

However, the lawsuit contends that the fact was known long before last week that the 220-foot-tall coaster would be out of commission.

The lawsuit states,

Advertisement

“The company withheld this information from season pass purchasers so as not to lose season pass customers, or, alternatively, so as not to offer a discount on season passes due to the unavailability of the Steel Curtain.”

The lawsuit also details numerous violations of the state’s unfair trade practices and consumer protection law. This includes failure to disclose the Steel Curtain’s closure with the full knowledge that the consumer believed that it would be functional for the 2024 season.

The park offered varied passes, which ranged from season passes priced from $109.99 to $239.99.

The lowest endowed pass was the bronze pass, which provided unfettered admission except on certain blackout dates.

Advertisement

The premium range included the platinum pass, which offered year-round admission to Kennywood, Sandcastle, Idlewild, and Palace Entertainment’s Dutch Wonderland in Lancaster.

Additionally, it also offered free parking, discounts on food and retail, and three free guest tickets.

Also Read: Prime Hydration Faces Lawsuits Claiming Its Sports Drink, Prime Energy, Contains PFAS and Excessive Caffeine

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Prime Hydration Faces Lawsuits Claiming Its Sports Drink, Prime Energy, Contains PFAS and Excessive Caffeine

Published

on

Prime Hydration

Prime Energy, the sports drink from Prime Hydration, has been hit by a number of lawsuits for containing excessive amounts of caffeine and PFAS. Another lawsuit was filed on April 8 in the Southern District of New York, accusing Prime Hydration, the parent company which manufactures the sports drink, of engaging in misleading and deceptive practices.

Prime Hydration was founded by two Logan Paul and KSI in 2022, and the products became very popular thanks to the huge followings of the YouTubers. However, the company is now facing a slew of lawsuits over the ingredients in their energy and sports drinks.

New Lawsuit Against Prime Hydration

The latest lawsuit, filed on April 8, accuses the company’s 12-ounce energy drinks of containing 215-225 milligrams of caffeine, exceeding the permissible limit of 200 milligrams. The lawsuit was filed by Lara Vera, a resident of Poughkeepsie, New York.

Advertisement

The lawsuit details that the plaintiff had purchased Prime’s Blue Raspberry products on numerous occasions in August 2022 for about $3 to $4 each, unaware that the products contained caffeine beyond the permissible limits. The plaintiff is seeking damages of $5 million from the company. Lara Vera’s lawsuit alleges that Prime advertised 200 milligrams of caffeine, which is equal to six Coke cans or two 12-ounce Red Bulls. One Red Bull can could contain 114 milligrams of caffeine.

Also Read: Johnson Controls subsidiary Tyco Fire Products to pay $750 mn to settle ‘forever chemicals’ lawsuit

The suit also alleges that there are no safe limits of caffeine for children and that caffeine has been indicted for causing tachycardia, headaches, convulsions, tremors, upset digestion, and adversely affecting mental health.

Advertisement

Earlier, Senator Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., had asked the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to investigate Prime energy drinks in 2023 after reports that the products contained high levels of caffeine. The Senator also accused the company of using vague marketing tactics focused on young people, influencing parents to buy the caffeine-laced drinks for their kids. The lawsuit by Vera also quotes the Senator’s call to the FDA.

Prime is also facing another lawsuit filed on Aug. 2, 2023, in the Northern District of California by the Milberg law firm on behalf of Elizabeth Castillo and others. The lawsuit charges Prime’s products with using flavors containing PFAS, or “forever chemicals.” Forever chemicals are a class of chemicals that are not degraded in the human body or nature and have been indicted as a carcinogenic substance. Independent third-party testing has confirmed that Prime Hydration grape flavor contained PFAS.

Also Read: California mother files lawsuit against Tesla after her 2-year-old child starts Model X and runs over her

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

This will close in 5 seconds