Connect with us

Business

Indian economy will accelerate in 2021-22, GDP growth projected to be 11%

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has presented the Economic Survey 2021 in Parliament today and it is today given to Chief Economic Advisor…

Published

on

SVB Crisis Triggers Loss in Global Financial Equities Worth $465 Bn in Two Days

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has presented the Economic Survey 2021 in Parliament today and it is today given to Chief Economic Advisor K.V. Subramanian launched. The Economic Survey estimates gross domestic product (GDP) growth to be higher than China. This survey reveals the picture of the country’s economy during the Corona crisis.

According to the survey, due to Corona, GDP in the current financial year. It is expected to fall by 7.7 percent, but after that, there will be a V-shape, hence the GDP in 2021-22. I will grow 11 percent. Nevertheless, it will take 2 years for the economy to reach pre-pandemic levels.

Also Read: Indian economy is expected to grow by 8.9% in the next financial year

Advertisement

Need for incentives and social security benefits

From April to June 2020 from Lockdown due to coronavirus, GDP was released. The size was reduced by 23.9 percent. After unlocking, the situation improved and the September quarter fell to just 7.5 percent. Thus in the first half of 2020-21, the GDP size is reduced by 15.7 percent. The survey estimated that there would be only a 0.1 percent drop in the second half. However, the major reason for this is the increase in government spending.

The survey also has a roadmap for the Indian economy, so special attention has been given to many things to become a $ 5 trillion economy. The Economic Survey 2020-21 ‘has been prepared by a team led by Chief Economic Advisor Krishnamurthy Venkat Subramanian, which describes the state of the various sectors of the economy as well as the reforms that must be undertaken to speed up development. The Economic Review states that there is a need for pay and career advancement, incentives for better work, and social security benefits for women at the workplace to increase women’s participation in the workforce in India.

Agricultural growth rate to be 3.4 percent, negative growth in industry and services

The biggest support for the economy this year is agriculture. Its growth rate is expected to be 3.4 percent. Gdp Its share in will also increase. It was 17.8 percent in 2019-20, to be 19.9 percent this year. Apart from agriculture, 2 sectors of the economy are industry and services. The industry is expected to decline 9.6 percent in the current financial year. The growth of the service sector will also be -8.8 percent. The weightage of food products should be revised to reflect the true picture of inflation in the country. The review noted that inflation should include new sources of price data amid increasing retail e-commerce transactions.

Advertisement

Also Read: Morning Consult claims – PM Modi is the most popular Leader in the world

85 percent of small farmers in the country benefit from new agricultural laws

These laws have been praised in the survey, even though farmers have been agitating for 2 months in protest against the new agricultural laws. Accordingly, the new laws will benefit small farmers. Farmers will have more rights when dealing with processors, whole sellers, and big retailers. 85 percent of the total farmers in the country are small farmers. Given the uncertainty in farming, the risk still remains for farmers. The risk from the new laws will be for those who deal with farmers in contract farming. Farmers will be able to fix the price of their crop. They will also get their payment in three days. Contract farming will also bring new technology to farming.

The survey found government spending on health care Has been said to be taken from 2.5 to 3 percent. This goal was also set in the National Health Policy of 2017. Despite this, it is still around 1 percent. Spending should increase in Internet connectivity and health infrastructure. The telemedicine also needs to be promoted.

Advertisement

Innovation is necessary to become the third major economy

The survey also mentioned the measures that can be adopted to accelerate the economic growth rate. It says that India is currently the 5th largest economy in the world. If it is to reach the third position, then it is important to focus on innovation. The global economy will also decline by 4.4 percent this year due to Corona. This will be the biggest decline in a century.

The government should revive taxpayer grievance redressal system by giving it more powers. In the year of salvation, 2021-22, G.D.P. Is likely to remain positive. The services and manufacturing sector has been negative in FY 2020-21. At the same time, real GDP in FY 2022. Growth is projected at 11 percent, while nominal GDP. The estimate is 15.4 percent. At the same time, the International Monetary Fund also says that India’s economy will be 11.5 percent in 2021 and in 2022 it will be around 6.8 percent.

Also Read: Six in 10 HR managers in favour of working virtually even after lockdown

Advertisement

Able to cover standard deviation, there will be a complete recovery in the economy in the next financial year. The derailed economy is now gaining momentum due to the Corona virus pandemic. V-shaped recovery has been observed in India. Steps to increase investment will be emphasized. Business activity will increase due to lower interest rate. It stated that the corona vaccine is possible to control the Pandemic and concrete steps are expected to be taken for further economic recovery.

Sovereign credit ratings of India do not provide information about fundamentals, written in a survey. Never in history has the BBB been rated as the 5th largest economy in the world. The fundamentals of India’s financial policy are strong. India’s forex reserve is capable of covering 2.8 standard deviations.

It is important that the sovereign credit rating methodology be made transparent. The Government of India has recognized 41,061 startups as on 23 December 2020. More than 39,000 start-ups across the country have provided employment to 4,70,000 people. SIDBI has committed Rs 4,326.95 crore to 60 alternative investment funds registered with SEBI by 1 December 2020.

Advertisement

Lokendra Deswar: A visionary Editor-in-Chief at Unique News Online, Lokendra wields 6+ years of seasoned experience. His academic prowess and keen insights shape his coverage of Politics, Viral stories, Sports, and Technology, offering a well-rounded perspective that captivates and informs.

World

New Class-Action Lawsuit Accuses Rivian of Making Materially False and Misleading Statements

Published

on

New Class-Action Lawsuit Accuses Rivian of Making Materially False and Misleading Statements

Electric vehicle manufacturer Rivian has been slapped with a lawsuit which alleged that the company misled the investors with false claims regarding its business, operations and prospects.

The class-action lawsuit made a number of allegations which included overstating the demand of its Electric vehicles and also not making it clear how it will handle the negative and near-term macroeconomic impacts.

The lawsuit also revealed that Rivian’s business was experiencing reduced demands as well as increased customer cancellations precipitated by inter alia, high interest rates.

Advertisement

The orders had significantly reduced and this has significantly reduced the profits and the manufacturing of vehicles in 2024.

Rivian Faces New Class-Action Lawsuit Alleging Deceptive Statements

The lawsuit also alleged that the Company’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

Rivian’s stock, like all other EV startups, has been tanking and this has angered the investors who saw a major portion of their investments eroded and a number of law firms like Bernstein Liebhard LLP announced this week that it has filed a securities class action lawsuit on investors’ behalf.

Advertisement

The lawsuit stated that the EV manufacturer had violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and has asked investors who had bought shares of Rivian Automotive, Inc. between March 1, 2023, and February 21, 2024, to join its suit.

The company’s stocks have fallen and one of the primary reasons was the high interest rates. Rivian’s products are beyond the reach of an average income household.

Also Read: Prime Hydration Faces Lawsuits Claiming Its Sports Drink, Prime Energy, Contains PFAS and Excessive Caffeine

Advertisement

The Rivian’s Electric vehicles target customers were wealthier clients and the spurt in order cancellations means this class is walking away from Rivian’s product.

The stocks of the company were popular for the investors but the reduced demands caused by higher borrowing cost have hit its stock prices badly.

The price war has also affected the EV sector and the company also with its competitors like Tesla has been uniformly affected.

Advertisement

The EV sector marked value has tanked by more than 57% year-to-date.

The chance of a fall in interest rates is not expected since the Federal Reserve will not lower the benchmark interest rate since it could lead to a bout of hyperinflation.

Also another factor which will discourage the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates is the soaring energy prices caused by the war in Ukraine and the Middle East.

Advertisement

Also Read: Lawsuit Claims Kennywood Concealed Steel Curtain Closure to Boost Sales

Continue Reading

World

Lawsuit Claims Kennywood Concealed Steel Curtain Closure to Boost Sales

Published

on

Lawsuit Claims Kennywood Concealed Steel Curtain Closure to Boost Sales

Kennywood’s Steel Curtain roller coaster will not be available this 2024 season, and this has miffed a Kensington man to the extent that he has filed a lawsuit against Kennywood and its parent companies, alleging that the officials had known this fact long before but withheld it to boost season pass sales.

Lawsuit Against Kennywood

The lawsuit, filed in the Allegheny County Common Pleas Court by Joshua Miller and his attorney, John A. Biedrzycki III on Monday, alleges that it was a deliberate attempt to hide the fact to accrue financial benefits by boosting season pass sales.

The lawsuit alleges that Kennywood has created advertising campaigns targeting consumers like Mr. Miller and others to purchase the 2024 season pass under the belief that the benefits included myriad park attractions, including the Steel Curtain.

Advertisement

In the lawsuit, it was revealed that Mr. Miller bought his season pass under the assumption that all rides would be operational.

However, on April 17, three days before the park opened for the season, it was revealed that Steel Curtain would be closed for the season.

The announcement was made by Ricky Spicuzza, the park’s assistant general manager, and the reason for the closure was cited as the coaster undergoing an “extensive modification project.”

Advertisement

Ricky Spicuzza said,

“We understand the frustration many of you have felt not being able to experience the Steel Curtain. On behalf of our entire team, we absolutely share that frustration with you.”

However, the lawsuit contends that the fact was known long before last week that the 220-foot-tall coaster would be out of commission.

The lawsuit states,

Advertisement

“The company withheld this information from season pass purchasers so as not to lose season pass customers, or, alternatively, so as not to offer a discount on season passes due to the unavailability of the Steel Curtain.”

The lawsuit also details numerous violations of the state’s unfair trade practices and consumer protection law. This includes failure to disclose the Steel Curtain’s closure with the full knowledge that the consumer believed that it would be functional for the 2024 season.

The park offered varied passes, which ranged from season passes priced from $109.99 to $239.99.

The lowest endowed pass was the bronze pass, which provided unfettered admission except on certain blackout dates.

Advertisement

The premium range included the platinum pass, which offered year-round admission to Kennywood, Sandcastle, Idlewild, and Palace Entertainment’s Dutch Wonderland in Lancaster.

Additionally, it also offered free parking, discounts on food and retail, and three free guest tickets.

Also Read: Prime Hydration Faces Lawsuits Claiming Its Sports Drink, Prime Energy, Contains PFAS and Excessive Caffeine

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Prime Hydration Faces Lawsuits Claiming Its Sports Drink, Prime Energy, Contains PFAS and Excessive Caffeine

Published

on

Prime Hydration

Prime Energy, the sports drink from Prime Hydration, has been hit by a number of lawsuits for containing excessive amounts of caffeine and PFAS. Another lawsuit was filed on April 8 in the Southern District of New York, accusing Prime Hydration, the parent company which manufactures the sports drink, of engaging in misleading and deceptive practices.

Prime Hydration was founded by two Logan Paul and KSI in 2022, and the products became very popular thanks to the huge followings of the YouTubers. However, the company is now facing a slew of lawsuits over the ingredients in their energy and sports drinks.

New Lawsuit Against Prime Hydration

The latest lawsuit, filed on April 8, accuses the company’s 12-ounce energy drinks of containing 215-225 milligrams of caffeine, exceeding the permissible limit of 200 milligrams. The lawsuit was filed by Lara Vera, a resident of Poughkeepsie, New York.

Advertisement

The lawsuit details that the plaintiff had purchased Prime’s Blue Raspberry products on numerous occasions in August 2022 for about $3 to $4 each, unaware that the products contained caffeine beyond the permissible limits. The plaintiff is seeking damages of $5 million from the company. Lara Vera’s lawsuit alleges that Prime advertised 200 milligrams of caffeine, which is equal to six Coke cans or two 12-ounce Red Bulls. One Red Bull can could contain 114 milligrams of caffeine.

Also Read: Johnson Controls subsidiary Tyco Fire Products to pay $750 mn to settle ‘forever chemicals’ lawsuit

The suit also alleges that there are no safe limits of caffeine for children and that caffeine has been indicted for causing tachycardia, headaches, convulsions, tremors, upset digestion, and adversely affecting mental health.

Advertisement

Earlier, Senator Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., had asked the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to investigate Prime energy drinks in 2023 after reports that the products contained high levels of caffeine. The Senator also accused the company of using vague marketing tactics focused on young people, influencing parents to buy the caffeine-laced drinks for their kids. The lawsuit by Vera also quotes the Senator’s call to the FDA.

Prime is also facing another lawsuit filed on Aug. 2, 2023, in the Northern District of California by the Milberg law firm on behalf of Elizabeth Castillo and others. The lawsuit charges Prime’s products with using flavors containing PFAS, or “forever chemicals.” Forever chemicals are a class of chemicals that are not degraded in the human body or nature and have been indicted as a carcinogenic substance. Independent third-party testing has confirmed that Prime Hydration grape flavor contained PFAS.

Also Read: California mother files lawsuit against Tesla after her 2-year-old child starts Model X and runs over her

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

This will close in 5 seconds