Connect with us

Business

May 10: The stock market rose for the fourth consecutive day, metal stocks rose again

The Indian stock market closed in the green mark on the first day of the week with good momentum. The benchmark indices BSE Sensex and NSE Nifty were up…

Published

on

May 10: The stock market rose for the fourth consecutive day, metal stocks rose again

The Indian stock market closed in the green mark on the first day of the week with good momentum. The benchmark indices BSE Sensex and NSE Nifty were up around 0.7% at the close of the market. It was also the fourth consecutive day in the stock market. Most of the metal stocks rose. Let’s see what was important in the market on Monday-

With the boom, the Sensex has reached above 49,500. At the same time, the Nifty 50 index was also close to 14,950 at the time of closing the market.

10 May Business Highlights

The BSE Sensex gained 296 points, while the NSE Nifty 50 index gained 119 points.

Advertisement

At the time of closing the stock market, 5 out of 30 stocks of the Sensex pack remained in the red mark. The Nifty pack gained 38 shares in 50.

In the Nifty Pack, shares of UPL, Hindalco, Wipro, Tata Steel, Sun Pharma, Divis Labs, Bajaj Finserv, Grasim and JSW Steel made their 52-week peak.

The Nifty Smallcap 100 and Nifty Midcap 100 indices closed in the opposite direction on 7 May. The midcap index weakened by 0.94% while the smallcap index gained 1.53%.

Advertisement

The Volatility Index (VIX) is down 2.88% to 20.22.

Market movements

Nifty

Open – 14,928.25
Close – 14,942.35
Variation – (+ 0.80%)
High – 14,966.90
Lo- 14,892.50

Sensex

Open- 49,496.05
Close – 49,502.41
Variation – (+ 0.60%)
High- 49,617.47
Lo- 49,412.05

Advertisement

What is the reason for the strength in the market?

For the fourth consecutive day in the market, the good signs of the foreign stock market played an important role in the hold of the bulls. In the economy of the RBI last week, the announcements made to maintain liquidity have been affected. With the continuous bounce, the market has now reached its previous valuation. Investors are also happy with the fourth quarter results. Despite the increasing cases of Corona, the absence of a nationwide lockdown also gives investors some relief. Recently, some states have also seen a decrease in Kovid cases.

Which sector did how well?

On the first day of the week, all the sector-based indices of the Nifty closed in the green stock market . The Nifty Metal Index gained the most by 3.14%. It had also strengthened by over 4.5% in the past day. Strongness in the pharma sector was also around 3%. At the same time, the boom in the Nifty Auto and Energy sectors was around 1.5%. The Bank, Reality and Financial Services index closed up around 0.75%. Apart from this, FMCG gained 0.24% while IT index gained 0.02%.

Nifty-50 shares seen the fastest in these stocks

Coal India (+ 7.45%)
UPL (+ 7.18%)
Hindalco (+ 6.15%)
IOC (+ 4.70%)
Tata Motors (+ 4.00%)

Advertisement

These shares of Nifty-50 are broken.

Shree Cement (-1.90%)
Britannia (-1.37%)
Ultratech Cement (-1.22%)
Infosys (-0.96%)
Hero MotoCorp (-0.86%)

Stocks that remain most active

According to Value, Tata Steel, Hindalco, and Tata Motors were the three most active stocks in the Nifty. At the same time, according to the volume, the stock market of Tata Steel, Coal India, and SBI dominated.

What is the signal for next

The constantly growing Corona cases can be a worry for the market. Investors will also be watching the fourth quarter results for the next few days. Investors should trade with caution.

Advertisement

Manvendra Chaudhary, with over 5 years of professional experience as CEO of Unique News and Megalent Marketing, shares insights on life, business, and health for your success.

World

New Class-Action Lawsuit Accuses Rivian of Making Materially False and Misleading Statements

Published

on

New Class-Action Lawsuit Accuses Rivian of Making Materially False and Misleading Statements

Electric vehicle manufacturer Rivian has been slapped with a lawsuit which alleged that the company misled the investors with false claims regarding its business, operations and prospects.

The class-action lawsuit made a number of allegations which included overstating the demand of its Electric vehicles and also not making it clear how it will handle the negative and near-term macroeconomic impacts.

The lawsuit also revealed that Rivian’s business was experiencing reduced demands as well as increased customer cancellations precipitated by inter alia, high interest rates.

Advertisement

The orders had significantly reduced and this has significantly reduced the profits and the manufacturing of vehicles in 2024.

Rivian Faces New Class-Action Lawsuit Alleging Deceptive Statements

The lawsuit also alleged that the Company’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

Rivian’s stock, like all other EV startups, has been tanking and this has angered the investors who saw a major portion of their investments eroded and a number of law firms like Bernstein Liebhard LLP announced this week that it has filed a securities class action lawsuit on investors’ behalf.

Advertisement

The lawsuit stated that the EV manufacturer had violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and has asked investors who had bought shares of Rivian Automotive, Inc. between March 1, 2023, and February 21, 2024, to join its suit.

The company’s stocks have fallen and one of the primary reasons was the high interest rates. Rivian’s products are beyond the reach of an average income household.

Also Read: Prime Hydration Faces Lawsuits Claiming Its Sports Drink, Prime Energy, Contains PFAS and Excessive Caffeine

Advertisement

The Rivian’s Electric vehicles target customers were wealthier clients and the spurt in order cancellations means this class is walking away from Rivian’s product.

The stocks of the company were popular for the investors but the reduced demands caused by higher borrowing cost have hit its stock prices badly.

The price war has also affected the EV sector and the company also with its competitors like Tesla has been uniformly affected.

Advertisement

The EV sector marked value has tanked by more than 57% year-to-date.

The chance of a fall in interest rates is not expected since the Federal Reserve will not lower the benchmark interest rate since it could lead to a bout of hyperinflation.

Also another factor which will discourage the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates is the soaring energy prices caused by the war in Ukraine and the Middle East.

Advertisement

Also Read: Lawsuit Claims Kennywood Concealed Steel Curtain Closure to Boost Sales

Continue Reading

World

Lawsuit Claims Kennywood Concealed Steel Curtain Closure to Boost Sales

Published

on

Lawsuit Claims Kennywood Concealed Steel Curtain Closure to Boost Sales

Kennywood’s Steel Curtain roller coaster will not be available this 2024 season, and this has miffed a Kensington man to the extent that he has filed a lawsuit against Kennywood and its parent companies, alleging that the officials had known this fact long before but withheld it to boost season pass sales.

Lawsuit Against Kennywood

The lawsuit, filed in the Allegheny County Common Pleas Court by Joshua Miller and his attorney, John A. Biedrzycki III on Monday, alleges that it was a deliberate attempt to hide the fact to accrue financial benefits by boosting season pass sales.

The lawsuit alleges that Kennywood has created advertising campaigns targeting consumers like Mr. Miller and others to purchase the 2024 season pass under the belief that the benefits included myriad park attractions, including the Steel Curtain.

Advertisement

In the lawsuit, it was revealed that Mr. Miller bought his season pass under the assumption that all rides would be operational.

However, on April 17, three days before the park opened for the season, it was revealed that Steel Curtain would be closed for the season.

The announcement was made by Ricky Spicuzza, the park’s assistant general manager, and the reason for the closure was cited as the coaster undergoing an “extensive modification project.”

Advertisement

Ricky Spicuzza said,

“We understand the frustration many of you have felt not being able to experience the Steel Curtain. On behalf of our entire team, we absolutely share that frustration with you.”

However, the lawsuit contends that the fact was known long before last week that the 220-foot-tall coaster would be out of commission.

The lawsuit states,

Advertisement

“The company withheld this information from season pass purchasers so as not to lose season pass customers, or, alternatively, so as not to offer a discount on season passes due to the unavailability of the Steel Curtain.”

The lawsuit also details numerous violations of the state’s unfair trade practices and consumer protection law. This includes failure to disclose the Steel Curtain’s closure with the full knowledge that the consumer believed that it would be functional for the 2024 season.

The park offered varied passes, which ranged from season passes priced from $109.99 to $239.99.

The lowest endowed pass was the bronze pass, which provided unfettered admission except on certain blackout dates.

Advertisement

The premium range included the platinum pass, which offered year-round admission to Kennywood, Sandcastle, Idlewild, and Palace Entertainment’s Dutch Wonderland in Lancaster.

Additionally, it also offered free parking, discounts on food and retail, and three free guest tickets.

Also Read: Prime Hydration Faces Lawsuits Claiming Its Sports Drink, Prime Energy, Contains PFAS and Excessive Caffeine

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Prime Hydration Faces Lawsuits Claiming Its Sports Drink, Prime Energy, Contains PFAS and Excessive Caffeine

Published

on

Prime Hydration

Prime Energy, the sports drink from Prime Hydration, has been hit by a number of lawsuits for containing excessive amounts of caffeine and PFAS. Another lawsuit was filed on April 8 in the Southern District of New York, accusing Prime Hydration, the parent company which manufactures the sports drink, of engaging in misleading and deceptive practices.

Prime Hydration was founded by two Logan Paul and KSI in 2022, and the products became very popular thanks to the huge followings of the YouTubers. However, the company is now facing a slew of lawsuits over the ingredients in their energy and sports drinks.

New Lawsuit Against Prime Hydration

The latest lawsuit, filed on April 8, accuses the company’s 12-ounce energy drinks of containing 215-225 milligrams of caffeine, exceeding the permissible limit of 200 milligrams. The lawsuit was filed by Lara Vera, a resident of Poughkeepsie, New York.

Advertisement

The lawsuit details that the plaintiff had purchased Prime’s Blue Raspberry products on numerous occasions in August 2022 for about $3 to $4 each, unaware that the products contained caffeine beyond the permissible limits. The plaintiff is seeking damages of $5 million from the company. Lara Vera’s lawsuit alleges that Prime advertised 200 milligrams of caffeine, which is equal to six Coke cans or two 12-ounce Red Bulls. One Red Bull can could contain 114 milligrams of caffeine.

Also Read: Johnson Controls subsidiary Tyco Fire Products to pay $750 mn to settle ‘forever chemicals’ lawsuit

The suit also alleges that there are no safe limits of caffeine for children and that caffeine has been indicted for causing tachycardia, headaches, convulsions, tremors, upset digestion, and adversely affecting mental health.

Advertisement

Earlier, Senator Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., had asked the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to investigate Prime energy drinks in 2023 after reports that the products contained high levels of caffeine. The Senator also accused the company of using vague marketing tactics focused on young people, influencing parents to buy the caffeine-laced drinks for their kids. The lawsuit by Vera also quotes the Senator’s call to the FDA.

Prime is also facing another lawsuit filed on Aug. 2, 2023, in the Northern District of California by the Milberg law firm on behalf of Elizabeth Castillo and others. The lawsuit charges Prime’s products with using flavors containing PFAS, or “forever chemicals.” Forever chemicals are a class of chemicals that are not degraded in the human body or nature and have been indicted as a carcinogenic substance. Independent third-party testing has confirmed that Prime Hydration grape flavor contained PFAS.

Also Read: California mother files lawsuit against Tesla after her 2-year-old child starts Model X and runs over her

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

This will close in 5 seconds