Business

Virtual Offices – Do I need one?

Virtual Offices – Do we need this? Say hello to the concept of virtual offices. Some ideas are here for you. You must visit this.

Published

4 years ago

October 19, 2020

Audrey Throne

person using macbook pro at Virtual Office

With technology affecting every sphere of our lives, how did you not think it wouldn’t benefit your business and its employees? How the Lockdown Made It Harder to Work From Home

Say hello to the concept of virtual offices. They rose to prominence more during COVID-19 when everyone was at home in quarantine.

Virtual offices are a technology that allows businesses and workers to be at home and offer their services to the companies they are working for.

The entire process is enabled through the internet. It allows organizations to be anywhere globally and operate without the need for a physical workplace.

Not having a physical office is just a start. Read this blog to find out why you need a virtual office right now:

Consumes less time

It takes a lot of time to communicate and get across another person in a physical workplace. Moreover, the commute to and from the office takes a lot of time. Thus, a lot of time is wasted on communicating and traveling, and less time is contributed to focusing on productivity.

If you have a virtual office, you do not have to go anywhere. You have to log in to your office ID and communicate with your workers directly from your home.

How easy does that sound?

Saves money

Time is money. Aside from your employees saving money due to less traveling, your businesses as a whole will be saving money – all thanks to virtual offices.

In a year, even if you have 50 employees or less, you might be giving them extra transport allowances, cost of parking passes, gas stipends, or affording their public transportation fees. Now, with a virtual office, you do not have to do that.

In addition to such expenses, you will also be saving money on your office materials and space. If you are at home and communicating with your employees – who are also at their home, why need a physical office, right?

So, you have to spend less money on rent, equipment, and supplies. You have cut the cost of doing business, and now your entire focus is on improving your revenues.

More expansion is possible.

Is your business growing at a rapid speed? Are you worried about how you will handle all the new employees and pay for the extra space?

All your worries have just one answer, and that’s a virtual office. If you have new employees coming in and do not have enough space to sit and work, then take advantage of a virtual office.

With this technology, you can connect to as many team members as you want, and you expand all you want. It will not only allow more employees on board, but your company will not be crowded with a lot of space.

There is one more advantage to a virtual office. You can expand and promote diversity in your company by hiring employees from other states. For example, you can sit in your Dallas virtual office and communicate with your employees in Florida or California.

How cool does it sound?

Increases workplace dedication

According to a survey, 90% of people who work from home recommend everyone to do it.

The question is, why do they recommend that? The answer is simple, and we all know it: working from home is super easy and too much fun. It takes away the stress of choosing an attire, walking or driving to the office, and being locked in a cubicle.

Employee satisfaction is correlated to the stress they face every day at a physical workplace. The environment, the traveling, and the distractions from co-workers all contribute towards it. However, that is reduced by a great deal when a person is working from home.

One of the many incredible benefits of virtual offices is that the employees are more satisfied and dedicated to their work. Virtual offices create the perfect balance between work life and personal life, which improves your employees’ productivity.

Scale to any size

The essential part about virtual offices is that standard services, such as answering the phone, forwarding the mail, and scheduling the meetings, can be done quickly.

Instead of hiring extra people to perform such small tasks, your virtual office application or portal automatically takes care of these tasks. It saves costs, and it also allows you to focus more on essential tasks.

Final Thought

To sum up, virtual office can be a useful tool. They are perfect for businesses who want to minimize their extra costs, save time, and make use of a more talented and diversified group of people.

As mentioned above, those are some benefits that we think you can have if you go for a virtual office. If you feel there is more to it, then do let us know in the comments below.

Up Next

Five Best Ways to Set Up Your Home Office on A Budget

Don't Miss

6 Steps to Make Sure Your Business Conference Will Go Well

Audrey Throne

Greetings, I’m Audrey. I’m a Blogger living in Birmingham, United Kingdom. I am a fan of music, technology, and entrepreneurship. I’m also interested in fitness and yoga.

Business

Gerber and Perrigo Face New Lawsuit Over ‘Store-Brand’ Infant Formula Pricing; All Pending Toxic Baby Food Cases Consolidated into New Class Action MDL

Published

1 day ago

April 27, 2024

Manoj Nair

Infant formula makers Gerber and Perrigo have been hit with a class-action lawsuit, which accuses the companies of artificially creating a shortage and jacking up prices for “store-brand” formula sold at Walmart, Walgreens, and other retailers.

The lawsuit was filed on Monday in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia. It accuses Perrigo of violating antitrust laws by collaborating with Gerber to prevent competitors from entering the market for store-brand formula.

Perrigo, one of the nation’s largest suppliers of store-brand formula, sells its products under retail labels at prices lower than similar branded products. However, the lawsuit alleges that Gerber, by granting Perrigo the first right of refusal to Gerber’s excess formula supply, which could have been sold to other competitors, is engaging in practices that stifle competition.

The lawsuit claims that through this arrangement, Gerber agreed to keep its excess formula out of the store-brand market, thereby gaining a share of Perrigo’s profits. The lawsuit was filed by four residents of California, Illinois, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, who will represent millions of customers who have purchased store-brand baby formula. The lawsuit does not name formula retailers as defendants. It asks the court to intervene and end the anticompetitive deals between Perrigo and Gerber and seeks more than $5 million in monetary damages.

This lawsuit is similar to another case filed in Brooklyn federal court by a potential store-brand competitor, P&L Development. Gerber and Perrigo requested the dismissal of that case, which was denied by the judge in February. The companies involved in the lawsuit claimed they compete fairly with other infant formula manufacturers, including those of store-brand formulas. The lawsuit also cited the squeezing out of P&L Development from the store-brand market, which has led to higher prices.

Gerber is also facing numerous lawsuits accusing its brands of baby food of containing dangerously high levels of toxic heavy metals, such as lead, arsenic, and mercury. These heavy metals are extremely toxic, even for adults, and can have catastrophic consequences on developing children, leading to health complications and neurological damage. Conditions such as ADHD and autism may be linked to consuming these toxic baby foods.

On April 11, 2024, all the lawsuits pertaining to toxic baby foods, which had been filed at different times in various courts, were consolidated into a new class action MDL in the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Besides Gerber, other baby food manufacturers like Beech-Nut and Campbell Soup Co. have also been named as defendants.

Also Read: Leading Ethereum Blockchain Entity Files Lawsuit Against SEC, Requests Court Declaration That Token Is Not a Security

Business

Leading Ethereum Blockchain Entity Files Lawsuit Against SEC, Requests Court Declaration That Token Is Not a Security

Published

1 day ago

April 27, 2024

Manoj Nair

Leading Ethereum Blockchain Entity Files Lawsuit Against SEC, Requests Court Declaration That Token Is Not a Security

The legal wrangling between the crypto sector and the SEC, or the Securities and Exchange Commission, is getting uglier, with ConsenSys, a major protagonist of the Ethereum Blockchain, filing a lawsuit against the regulatory body in a Texas federal court. This legal action seeks an intervention to ward off a looming SEC lawsuit against the company regarding features of its popular MetaMask wallet. The lawsuit also seeks the court’s help in deciding once and for all the vexed question of whether Ethereum’s digital token, Ether, is not a security. The legal uncertainty hangs heavily on the crypto sector and puts a question mark on its very existence.

In an exhaustive 34-page legal filing, ConsenSys states that the SEC’s endeavor to exert control over Ethereum is both illegal and a threat to blockchain technology.

The complaint states,

“The SEC’s unlawful seizure of authority over ETH would spell disaster for the Ethereum network, and for ConsenSys. Every holder of ETH, including ConsenSys, would fear violating the securities laws if he or she were to transfer ETH on the network. This would bring the use of the Ethereum blockchain in the United States to a halt, crippling one of the internet’s greatest innovations.”

The lawsuit also alleges that SEC Chairman Gary Gensler has embarked on an aggressive enforcement policy directed at the big players in the crypto sector like Coinbase and Uniswap. The lawsuit particularly points out a campaign that involved a deluge of subpoenas asking firms and developers for documents related to their dealings with the nonprofit Ethereum Foundation, which supports the blockchain’s development.

The crypto sector is up in arms against Gensler’s tactics and has contended that the SEC has never provided clear rules meant for the distinct features of blockchain technology. However, Gensler negates this argument, saying that the existing securities laws are clear and sufficient, and that the crypto industry refuses to comply with them.

Gensler’s actions are full of contradictions since, in the past, the SEC had maintained that blockchain’s tokens, like Bitcoin, are not securities and hence beyond its purview. A senior official in 2018 had stated that Ethereum has reached a state where it is adequately decentralized, and further, the agency also gave the green signal for the launch of Ethereum futures trading—an implicit acknowledgement that Ether is a commodity. However, at present, Gensler is using a recent feature of Ethereum, known as staking, as grounds for the recent legal campaign.

The lawsuit was filed after the SEC issued a Wells Notice, which is akin to a formal letter warning that the agency intends to sue a firm and could lead to a settlement later. The SEC charged ConsenSys that MetaMask was operating as an unlicensed broker-dealer. MetaMask offered users a means to stake Ethereum on their behalf. Staking was a feature introduced in September 2022 on the Blockchain as a replacement for the energy-intensive mining process. The process involves a system of validators who pledge collateral to become trusted validators.

The SEC objects to the process of staking, which has changed Ethereum from a commodity into a security. ConsenSys founder Joe Lubin has called this account of the SEC “preposterous”.

Lubin said,

“The act of staking is really just posting a security bond so you can get paid to contribute labor and resources to help operate the Ethereum protocol. Now they’re trying to turn that into some sort of investment contract.”

Lubin also stated that the SEC’s actions will lead to a halt in the growth of the crypto sector and blockchain technology as a whole. Lubin feels that the SEC seeks to block pending applications by companies to launch spot ETFs for Ethereum, following the huge popularity of Bitcoin ETFs. The SEC is in fact trying to regulate a technology on its merits and it will only stifle innovation.

Also Read: New Class-Action Lawsuit Accuses Rivian of Making Materially False and Misleading Statements

Net Worth

Caterina Fake Net Worth 2024: How Much is the American entrepreneur and businesswoman Worth?

Published

3 days ago

April 26, 2024

Vishnu Chaudhary

Caterina Fake Net Worth 2024: How Much is the American entrepreneur and businesswoman Worth?

Who is Caterina Fake?

Caterina Fake is a renowned American entrepreneur and co-founder of several groundbreaking ventures, including Flickr and Hunch. Born on June 13, 1969, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Fake has been a driving force in reshaping the digital landscape through her innovative ideas and entrepreneurial acumen.

View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Caterina Fake (@cefake)

Caterina Fake Career

From her early days in Pittsburgh to her rise in Silicon Valley, Caterina Fake’s career has been marked by a relentless pursuit of excellence. Co-founding platforms like Flickr and Hunch, she has revolutionized how we connect and share information online. Her visionary leadership and creative brilliance have cemented her status as a trailblazer in the tech industry.

Caterina Fake Net Worth

As of 2024, according to TheRichest, Caterina Fake’s net worth stands at an impressive $25 million. Her entrepreneurial ventures, including Flickr and Hunch, have contributed significantly to her financial success. With a keen eye for emerging trends and a knack for innovation, Fake continues to inspire aspiring entrepreneurs around the world.

Caterina Fake Age

Currently 54 years old, Caterina Fake was born on June 13, 1969. Despite her age, she remains a dynamic force in the business world, constantly pushing the boundaries of what’s possible in technology and entrepreneurship.

Caterina Fake Family: Husband and Children

Caterina Fake was previously married to Stewart Butterfield, with whom she co-founded Flickr. They tied the knot in 2001 but announced their split in 2007. They share one child, Mint Butterfield, who has recently been reported missing. Caterina Fake is currently in a relationship with Jaiku co-founder Jyri Engeström.

Caterina Fake Height and Weight

While specific details about Caterina Fake’s height and weight are not readily available, her stature in the tech industry is undeniable. Standing tall as a visionary leader and innovator, Fake’s impact transcends physical measurements, leaving an enduring legacy in the digital sphere.

Also Read: Ethan Payne Net Worth 2024: How Much is the English YouTuber, Streamer, and Internet Personality Worth?