World

London’s Bridges Really Are Falling Down

LONDON — One after the other, they stepped ahead to inform their tales. Youngsters out of the blue compelled to journey two hours every approach to college. Pensioners whose weekly docs’ appointments have changed into arduous, half-day treks. Shopkeepers whose companies have been crippled by the disappearance of commuters.

All as a result of Hammersmith Bridge, an imposing however badly corroded 19th-century suspension bridge that connects the district of Barnes with a lot of London, was closed final month for security causes.

“Now, I have to get up at quarter previous 6, every single day, six days per week,” stated Aston Jenkins, 10, drawing sympathetic groans from the pissed off, if exceedingly well mannered, crowd protesting just lately on the bridge. “I can’t deal with that.”

Whereas Hammersmith Bridge’s structural issues are significantly dire, it’s removed from the one London bridge that’s crumbling. Two main crossings within the metropolis middle, Vauxhall Bridge and London Bridge, are closed to automotive site visitors whereas they obtain pressing repairs. Tower Bridge, the very image of London, was closed for 2 days final month after a mechanical glitch jammed its drawbridge open.

It fell to a younger schoolgirl — outfitted in a crimson cardigan and patent-leather Mary Janes, and brandishing a placard with offended pink letters — to make the inevitable level: “London Bridges are falling down!”

Like other London roads and bridges, Hammersmith Bridge had been neglected for decades. Fully repairing it would cost an estimated 141 million pounds ($187 million) — funds that neither Hammersmith & Fulham Council, which owns the bridge, nor London’s transportation authority, which depends on it, currently have.

Transport for London, which runs the subway and bus system and some major roads, has already had to negotiate a nearly £2 billion bailout from the government to make up for a shortfall in revenue after ridership plummeted during the lockdown. Except for rush hour, London’s subways are still largely ghost trains.

Hammersmith has appealed for help to Prime Minister Boris Johnson. But he won election by promising to spend money on marquee projects like a $130 billion-plus high-speed railway, not a cast-iron relic of Queen Victoria’s reign.

He also wants to spread the wealth to Britain’s economically challenged Midlands and North, not rescue a leafy, affluent enclave of London, where professionals commute from gracious Regency villas to jobs in the City and students practice on the manicured playing fields of the elite St. Paul’s School.

“The national government is afraid of spending money in London because it would threaten its ‘leveling up’ agenda,” said Tony Travers, an expert in urban affairs at the London School of Economics. “Promising to build shiny things for the future is more attractive than fixing road surfaces or mending bridges.”

It doesn’t help that the member of Parliament from Mr. Johnson’s Conservatives who represented the district that encompasses Barnes, Zac Goldsmith, lost his seat in the last election. Mr. Goldsmith, a well-connected friend of Mr. Johnson’s, had pledged to fix the bridge during his campaign. His successor, Sarah Olney, from the centrist Liberal Democrats, said she could not get any cabinet ministers to answer her letters pleading for help.

Michael White, a former political editor at The Guardian who lives on the north bank of the Thames, pointed out a problem of asymmetry: Barnes, on the southern side, needs the bridge more than Hammersmith, on the northern side, because scores of its commuters cross it every day to reach the nearest Tube station. There is less traffic in the opposite direction, which makes an expensive repair job politically hard to sell for officials in less well-off Hammersmith.

Still, the Labour Party leader of the council, Stephan Cowan, insisted that Hammersmith was fully committed to fixing the bridge — if it can find a financial lifeline. He credited the council with averting a potential calamity by hiring engineers to inspect the bridge in 2014. They found a web of tiny fractures in its cast-iron pedestals, evidence of untold years of corrosion.

In April 2019, the authorities closed the bridge to cars, but left it open to pedestrians and cyclists. Then, after a recent heat wave, inspectors discovered that the fractures had widened. Because cast iron is more brittle than steel, those changes raised the danger that the pedestals could shatter, plunging the bridge into the Thames. The council immediately closed the bridge to everyone.

“If we hadn’t done the comprehensive integrity review,” Mr. Cowan said, “I genuinely believe we could have had a catastrophe.”

Not only is the bridge, and the footpath under it, off limits, the Port of London has banned boats from sailing underneath it. That will disrupt the annual Boat Race between Oxford and Cambridge universities, since by customized, the rowers cowl a 4.2-mile stretch of the Thames that rounds the bend at Barnes, the place revelers line up underneath the bridge’s swooping cables.

In a letter to the prime minister final month, Mr. Cowan appealed to Mr. Johnson’s sense of historical past. What a “horrible metaphor” it could be, he stated, to permit a pioneering instance of 19th-century engineering “to easily crumble away in the midst of the Thames, on the coronary heart of our capital metropolis.” In reality, he stated, the bridge’s uncommon design has lengthy made it susceptible to structural issues, and its cast-iron development has made it a lot more durable and costlier to repair.

The bridge narrowly escaped destruction in 1996 when the Irish Republican Military planted two highly effective plastic explosives beneath that failed to detonate. Four years later, another I.R.A. faction successfully exploded a bomb under the bridge, forcing it to close for repairs for two years.

Residents could face a similar or even longer wait this time. Even stopgap fixes are costly: Stabilizing the bridge enough so that people could walk across it and boats could pass under it would cost £46 million, Mr. Cowan said. Building a temporary bridge for pedestrians and cyclists would cost £27 million and take six to nine months.

In the meantime, the locals are floating other solutions, like starting a ferry service or running shuttle buses. Some, like Toby Gordon-Smith, have resorted to roundabout routes across other bridges (there are more than a dozen road or pedestrian crossings between Hammersmith Bridge and Tower Bridge). Mr. Gordon-Smith, 46, who uses a wheelchair, said he chose to live in a riverfront apartment in Barnes because he could wheel himself across the bridge to his office in Hammersmith — 10 minutes door to door.

“This is an important place for me to live, to be able to access my work, to be able to access the rest of London,” he said.

For older people who came to the rally, the fragility of London’s bridges is more than just grist for a nursery rhyme. Christopher Morcom, 81, recalled that in 1967, an American entrepreneur, Robert McCulloch, bought the crumbling London Bridge, dismantled it, and transported it stone by stone to Lake Havasu City, Ariz., the place it now sits as a vacationer attraction within the desert. (The London Bridge at the moment present process work is a alternative for that 19th-century model.)

All of it gave Mr. Morcom the germ of an concept. “I don’t know whether or not this previous bridge is reparable,” he stated, gesturing to Hammersmith Bridge. “Perhaps we must always promote it to the president of the US.”

Editorial Team

Passionate news enthusiast with a flair for words. Our Editorial Team author brings you the latest updates, in-depth analysis, and engaging stories. Stay informed with their well-researched articles.

Related Articles

This will close in 5 seconds